Is being an Agnostic a way of hedging one’s bets, spiritually speaking? Is it the lazy way of avoiding picking a spiritual path? Is uncertainty acceptable in a country where it is common practice to speak in tone that suggest that the speaker is the bearer of absolute truth?
As an agnostic, I’ve heard my lack of belief referred to as both cowardly and lazy. I would say being obstinate in one’s on belief, despite a lack of evidence, or evidence to the contrary, is not bold, nor does it require effort. When millions and millions of people share a belief, standing up to be counted amongst them is certainly not an act of bravery. Being too stubborn to ask questions, or to consider the view of skeptic is lazy. It’s easier to have blind faith than it is to question that which is a commonly practiced belief system.
People of faith are critical of those who are faithless because they dare to question religious doctrine, and cast doubt upon the notions of sanctity and holiness. We agnostics see the flaws and the inconsistencies that exist in belief systems. It is not laziness to say “I do not believe.” It’s not cowardice.
To say “I don’t know” is an honest answer. It takes a degree of courage to stand apart from the crowd. Make no mistake, to be a person of faith is to be part of the majority. To be an Agnostic is to be part of a small community of skeptics. To be always seeking answers is not lazy. Uncertainty in world full of people who are certain they have The Answer is more difficult that one might assume.